Assessment Rubrics

A  (A+, A, A-)
(8.5 – 10)*
Distinction
Outstanding. Overall, the individual presentation on the e-learning plan demonstrates an excellent ability to plan carefully, think critically and synthesize clearly the essential elements of a practical and innovative school-based e-learning approach, including an appropriate key learning area; well-defined learning objective(s); e-learning activities; staff training/sharing approaches; and an appropriate form of evaluation for the plan. Plan is communicated effectively with very few or no major grammatical errors and/or major gaps in meaning. 
B (B+, B, B-)
(7.0 – 8.4)*
Good
Good. Overall, the individual presentation on the e-learning plan demonstrates a good ability to plan well, think critically and combine some essential elements of a practical and effective school-based e-learning approach, including an appropriate key learning area; well-defined learning objective(s); e-learning activities; staff training/sharing approaches; and an appropriate form of evaluation for the plan. Plan is communicated well with few major grammatical errors and/or major gaps in meaning. 
C (C+, C)
(6.0 – 6.9)*
Satisfactory
Adequate/Satisfactory. Overall, the individual presentation on the e-learning plan demonstrates a satisfactory ability to plan, think critically and combine elements of a practical school-based e-learning approach, including a key learning area; defined learning objective(s); e-learning activities; staff training/sharing approaches; and a clear form of evaluation for the plan. Plan is communicated well with some major grammatical errors and/or major gaps in meaning. 
C-, D
(4.5 – 5.9)*

Weak. Overall, the individual presentation on the e-learning plan demonstrates a limited ability to plan, think critically and combine elements of a practical school-based e-learning approach, including a key learning area; defined learning objective(s); e-learning activities; staff training/sharing approaches; and an evaluation for the plan. Plan is not clearly communicated, with some major grammatical errors and/or major gaps in meaning. 
Fail
(0 – 4.4)*

Very weak/Unacceptable/Incomplete. Little evidence of thoughtful planning or critical thinking; poorly conceived and organised; inadequately presented/designed and insufficiently addressing the different aspects of the assignment. Several and/or major grammatical errors and or major gaps in effective communication. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lecture 3 Teaching Listening and Vocabulary with IT tools