Assessment Rubrics
A
(A+, A, A-)
(8.5 – 10)*
Distinction
|
Outstanding. Overall, the individual presentation on the e-learning plan
demonstrates an excellent ability to plan carefully, think critically and synthesize clearly
the essential elements of a practical and innovative school-based e-learning
approach, including an appropriate key learning area; well-defined learning
objective(s); e-learning activities; staff
training/sharing approaches; and an appropriate form of evaluation for the
plan. Plan is communicated effectively with very few or no major grammatical
errors and/or major gaps in meaning.
|
B (B+, B, B-)
(7.0 – 8.4)*
Good
|
Good. Overall, the individual presentation on the e-learning plan demonstrates a
good ability to plan well, think critically and combine some essential elements
of a practical and effective school-based e-learning approach, including an
appropriate key learning area; well-defined learning objective(s); e-learning activities; staff training/sharing approaches; and an
appropriate form of evaluation for the plan. Plan is communicated well with
few major grammatical errors and/or major gaps in meaning.
|
C (C+, C)
(6.0 – 6.9)*
Satisfactory
|
Adequate/Satisfactory. Overall, the
individual presentation on the e-learning plan demonstrates a satisfactory
ability to plan, think critically and combine elements of a practical
school-based e-learning approach, including a key learning area; defined
learning objective(s); e-learning activities;
staff training/sharing approaches; and a clear form of evaluation for the
plan. Plan is communicated well with some major grammatical errors and/or
major gaps in meaning.
|
C-, D
(4.5 – 5.9)*
|
Weak. Overall, the individual presentation on the e-learning plan
demonstrates a limited ability to plan, think critically and combine elements
of a practical school-based e-learning approach, including a key learning
area; defined learning objective(s);
e-learning activities; staff training/sharing approaches; and an evaluation
for the plan. Plan is not clearly communicated, with some major grammatical
errors and/or major gaps in meaning.
|
Fail
(0 – 4.4)*
|
Very weak/Unacceptable/Incomplete.
Little evidence of thoughtful planning or critical thinking; poorly conceived
and organised; inadequately presented/designed and insufficiently addressing
the different aspects of the assignment. Several and/or major grammatical
errors and or major gaps in effective communication.
|
Comments
Post a Comment